Find Insurance Markets,
Get Quotes

Simply search by coverage or keyword and find the market you are looking for in seconds.

ProgramBusiness Banner Image

This Week's Featured Markets

Stay Up To Date on New Markets

Stay Up To Date on New Markets

Get alerts to your inbox on new and trending markets each week.

=

Connecting People with Insurance Problems to People with Insurance Solutions

Whether you are a Carrier, MGA, Wholesale, Retail Agent, or Broker, we have a solution for you. Leverage our platform to streamline your processes and grow your business.

Looking For Market Distribution?

ProgramBusiness for Carriers, MGA’s & Wholesalers

Our robust platform enables agents to quickly contact you and begin the underwriting, quoting, and submission process.

Schedule a demo Learn More
ProgramBusiness for <span>Carriers, MGA’s & Wholesalers</span> 1

Get a searchable business directory, with any number of program listings

ProgramBusiness for <span>Carriers, MGA’s & Wholesalers</span> 2

Get your program in front our our network of over 80,000+ independent agents

ProgramBusiness for <span>Carriers, MGA’s & Wholesalers</span> 3

Market your programs via on site ads and email marketing campaigns

Looking for a Market?

ProgramBusiness for Retail Agents & Brokers

Find the perfect market for your risk. Search by coverage or keyword and region and start getting quotes immediately.

Sign Up for Free Learn more
ProgramBusiness for <span>Retail Agents & Brokers</span> 1

Search 350+ Specialty Programs by coverage or keyword

ProgramBusiness for <span>Retail Agents & Brokers</span> 2

Submit Acords, Drivers’ Schedules, and Loss Runs directly on the platform

ProgramBusiness for <span>Retail Agents & Brokers</span> 3

Try new niche markets and expand your footprint in industries you already serve

ProgramBusiness News

The world of insurance delivered. Insurance Industry News carefully curated by insurance industry experts. Stay up to date on breaking news, industry changes and updates, and press releases from all the major players.

Sign Up to Receive Updates Straight to Your Inbox
Federal Court Strikes Down Key Internal Revenue Service Rule on Micro Captive Insurance

Federal Court Strikes Down Key Internal Revenue Service Rule on Micro Captive Insurance

A federal court in Texas has struck down a key Internal Revenue Service rule affecting micro captive insurance arrangements, marking a notable development for tax policy and regulatory oversight.

On April 15, Senior Judge Lee H. Rosenthal of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas vacated the IRS classification of 831(b) micro captive insurance plans as “listed transactions.” The decision came in the case of Drake Plastics Ltd. Co. & SRA 831(b) Admin v. Internal Revenue Service. As a result, the court rejected the agency’s broad designation of these arrangements as presumptive tax shelters.

The ruling removes penalties and reputational implications tied to the “listed transaction” label. However, it leaves in place a lower-tier disclosure requirement for these plans.

SRA 831(b) Admin, a plan manager founded in 2008, participated in the case as a co-plaintiff. The company provides administration services for 831(b) Plans, which are used by small- to medium-sized businesses as part of structured risk management strategies.

An 831(b) Plan is a tax-deferral mechanism that allows businesses to set aside funds to self-insure against risks that are either underinsured or excluded from traditional policies. These risks may include supply chain disruptions, litigation exposure, cyber insurance exclusions, warranties, and other low-frequency but high-severity events. The plans were established under the Tax Reform Act of 1986.

Interest in 831(b) Plans has increased since the COVID-19 pandemic. During that period, many insurers adjusted coverage terms, reduced limits, or introduced new exclusions. As a result, some businesses have sought alternative methods to address coverage gaps.

The court’s decision specifically addressed the IRS’s attempt to broadly classify these arrangements without individualized evaluation. By vacating the “listed transaction” designation, the court removed associated compliance burdens, including potential fines of up to $200,000.

Dustin Carlson, president of SRA 831(b) Admin, said the ruling addresses concerns about how these plans have been evaluated. He stated that the decision reinforces the need for fact-based assessments rather than broad categorizations.

According to Carlson, the case reflects broader questions about regulatory authority and enforcement practices. He noted that the court rejected the approach of labeling arrangements as tax shelters before establishing supporting evidence.

Industry observers have indicated that the ruling may influence how the IRS approaches enforcement and rulemaking going forward. The decision comes in the context of the post-Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo framework, which places limits on judicial deference to federal agencies.

Despite the removal of the “listed transaction” designation, 831(b) Plans remain subject to disclosure requirements. These plans continue to be positioned as part of broader risk management strategies, with contributions structured to provide tax-deferred funds to address uninsured losses.

SRA 831(b) Admin reports that it works with more than 1,500 businesses nationwide. The company focuses on compliance, education, and implementation of these plans as tools to address financial exposure related to underinsured and uninsured risks.

The court’s ruling represents a shift in how certain micro captive insurance arrangements are treated under federal tax rules. At the same time, it maintains oversight through existing disclosure requirements while removing a classification that had carried significant regulatory and financial consequences.

Get the latest insurance market updates and discover exclusive program opportunities at ProgramBusiness.com
Read More
Senate Committee Rejects Bill Requiring Insurance Coverage for Fire-Resistant Homes

Senate Committee Rejects Bill Requiring Insurance Coverage for Fire-Resistant Homes

A California Senate committee has rejected legislation that would have required insurers to provide coverage to homeowners who reduce wildfire risks on their properties. The decision marks the latest setback for similar proposals introduced in recent years. The Senate Insurance Committee voted down Senate Bill 1076 on April 21. The measure, known as the Insurance Coverage for Fire-Safe Homes Act, was introduced by Sen. Sasha Renée Pérez, a Democrat from Pasadena. The bill aimed to address ongoing challenges in California’s property insurance market following the January 2025 wildfires, which damaged or destroyed more than 18,000 structures and resulted in 31 fatalities. Under its original framework, SB 1076 would have required insurers to offer and renew coverage for homes that meet the state insurance commissioner's wildfire safety standards, beginning Jan. 1, 2028. The proposal also included enforcement measures, such as potential restrictions on insurers that failed to comply, though some exceptions were allowed. In response to opposition from the insurance industry, the bill was later revised. The amended version proposed community-based pilot programs to evaluate how wildfire mitigation efforts could reduce property losses and insurance exposure. Insurers participating in successful pilot areas would have been required to offer four years of coverage to qualifying homeowners. Industry representatives maintained their opposition despite the revisions. Denni Ritter, vice president of the American Property Casualty Insurance Association, told lawmakers that the bill would interfere with underwriting practices and financial safeguards. She stated that the proposal would replace insurer risk assessment with statutory requirements, which the association considers a fundamental issue. Several lawmakers also expressed concerns during the committee hearing. Sen. Laura Richardson, a Democrat from San Pedro, cited broader concerns about government mandates on private companies when explaining her vote against the bill. Committee Chair Sen. Steve Padilla responded by noting the effort to balance industry concerns with the need for data and policy solutions related to wildfire risk and insurance availability. The proposal represented the fourth attempt since 2020 to pass legislation requiring insurers to cover properties that meet wildfire mitigation standards. These measures typically include clearing vegetation, installing fire-resistant roofing, and sealing structural openings to prevent embers from entering. The broader context for the bill includes changes in the insurance market leading up to the 2025 wildfires. Many insurers reduced their exposure in high-risk areas by dropping policyholders, thereby increasing reliance on the California FAIR Plan. This state-backed program serves as the insurer of last resort and offers limited coverage at higher costs. According to an analysis cited in the report, enrollment in the FAIR Plan nearly doubled in wildfire-affected regions between 2020 and 2024, from 14,272 to 28,440 policies. Supporters of SB 1076 included advocacy organizations and community groups formed after the wildfires, as well as several professional and environmental associations. However, opposition from insurers remained a central factor in the bill’s outcome. Other insurance-related legislation moved forward in the same committee session. Two additional bills introduced by Pérez advanced, including measures to increase transparency in the claims process and impose penalties for delayed payments. A separate bill addressing policy non-renewals also passed. Stay informed and ahead of the curve — explore more industry insights and program opportunities at ProgramBusiness.com.
Read More
Theft Risks Increase for Farm Equipment During Spring Planting Season

Theft Risks Increase for Farm Equipment During Spring Planting Season

As planting season accelerates across agricultural regions, insurance professionals are highlighting an increased risk of theft involving farm machinery and equipment. According to Zachary Hinthorn of Country Financial, the seasonal surge in field activity creates conditions that may expose valuable assets to potential loss.

During this period, farmers often leave tractors and implements in fields overnight to maintain efficiency. However, Hinthorn notes that this common practice can make equipment more accessible to thieves. He advises that operators take precautionary steps, including locking machinery whenever possible and removing valuable items before leaving the site.

Items such as GPS equipment remain a particular concern. Hinthorn points out that these components are frequently targeted due to their high value and portability. He says it is not uncommon for GPS systems, which can cost several thousand dollars, to be removed from unattended machinery. In addition to GPS units, he recommends securing or removing tablets, tools, and other unmounted valuables stored within equipment.

Location also plays a role in theft risk. While remote fields may seem less visible, Hinthorn explains that isolation can work to criminals' advantage. He notes that equipment placed in rural or less-trafficked areas may lack witnesses, making theft easier to go undetected. In contrast, machinery located near busier roads may benefit from increased visibility and the presence of potential witnesses.

In addition to physical security measures, Hinthorn highlights the importance of proper insurance coverage for modern agricultural technology. He explains that certain items, particularly GPS equipment, may require separate scheduling under an insurance policy. Coverage requirements can vary depending on how the policy is structured, so it is important for policyholders and agents to verify whether high-value components are adequately insured as standalone items or as part of broader equipment coverage.

Furthermore, Hinthorn emphasizes the value of conducting regular insurance reviews. He encourages farmers to meet annually with their insurance agents to assess their current coverage. These reviews help ensure that all equipment is properly insured and that policies reflect any changes in inventory. They also provide an opportunity to remove coverage for items no longer in use, helping avoid unnecessary costs.

As planting season continues, these considerations remain relevant for both risk management and policy oversight. By combining preventative practices with accurate insurance planning, stakeholders can better address the exposures associated with increased field activity.

Get the latest insurance market updates and discover exclusive program opportunities at ProgramBusiness.com
Read More
Amwins and Vivere Launch Exclusive California FAIR Plan Wrap Product

Amwins and Vivere Launch Exclusive California FAIR Plan Wrap Product

Amwins and Vivere have launched an exclusive California FAIR Plan Wrap product designed to address coverage gaps for insureds who rely on the state's insurer of last resort. Developed by Vivere and distributed exclusively through Amwins, the new product offers comprehensive coverage for commercial and dwelling risks across entire portfolios of California FAIR Plan insureds.

Filling a Gap in the California Property Market

Wildfire exposure, regulatory constraints, and capacity limitations have pushed many California property owners onto the FAIR Plan. However, the FAIR Plan does not cover all perils, and its limits often fall short of what insureds need. The Wrap product provides non-fire protection and covers losses that exceed FAIR Plan limits, bringing total coverage closer to private-market standards.

Product Details

For commercial risks, the product offers wrap limits up to $100 million. Dwelling wrap limits are available up to $3 million. All offerings are written on "A" rated paper and are subject to the Wrap policy's terms, conditions, limitations, and exclusions. Vivere built the product on proprietary technology that streamlines the quoting process. Using only a completed California FAIR Plan application, retailers can generate quotes for individual risks or entire portfolios within minutes. "Efficiency and underwriting discipline don't have to be mutually exclusive," said Rachael Dougherty, Chief Underwriting Officer, Specialty Property at Vivere. "This product brings together advanced technology and experienced underwriting to make it faster and easier for agents to place complex California property risks." Bob Black, Executive Vice President and National Property Practice Leader at Amwins, added: "In today's California property market, the FAIR Plan is often a necessary starting point, but it's rarely a complete solution. This product was built to address the real coverage gaps insureds are facing, combining broad protection, strong paper, and a streamlined placement process to help our partners deliver quality solutions with confidence."

About the Companies

Amwins is the largest independent wholesale distributor of specialty insurance products in the U.S. Based in Charlotte, N.C., the company operates through more than 138 offices worldwide and handles premium placements of more than $50 billion annually. Vivere, founded in 2025, is an independently owned specialty insurance platform. The company focuses on pairing underwriting expertise with purpose-built technology to improve speed, precision, and efficiency. For more information, contact your Amwins property broker or Amwins Access underwriter. Get the latest insurance market updates and discover exclusive program opportunities at ProgramBusiness.com
Read More

Subscribe to ProgramBusiness News

Get alerts to your inbox on insurance news.

=
Subscribe to ProgramBusiness News