A proposed budget bill from the U.S. House of Representatives includes more than $1 trillion in cuts to health care programs over the next decade, with significant implications for Medicaid recipients and Affordable Care Act (ACA) premium subsidies. If enacted, the legislation could result in at least 15 million people losing health insurance coverage and have ripple effects across the broader economy, especially in economically vulnerable regions.
Scope of Proposed Cuts
The bill includes approximately $715 billion in cuts to Medicaid and an additional $335 billion by ending ACA premium tax credits. The total cuts exceed $1 trillion over ten years. While the proposal includes work requirement provisions for Medicaid, those measures account for an estimated $280 billion in savings, meaning the majority of the reductions stem from broader coverage rollbacks.
Projected Coverage Losses
The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) initially projected that 13.7 million people could lose insurance under the proposed changes, but more recent estimates from the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities raise that figure to at least 15 million. These coverage losses would primarily affect low-income individuals who rely on Medicaid or ACA subsidies for health insurance.
Economic and Employment Impacts
Researchers estimate that the cuts would disproportionately affect local economies with higher unemployment rates. Approximately 27 million workers live in counties with weaker labor markets. Based on economic modeling from past federal spending programs, analysts estimate that for every $1 billion in reduced Medicaid funding, up to 25,000 jobs could be lost. This suggests that up to 850,000 jobs could be at risk in economically weaker counties if the bill’s proposed Medicaid cuts are implemented.
Health care providers, especially in rural areas, are expected to experience financial stress from these reductions. The bill would result in a $770 billion decrease in payments to providers over ten years, potentially leading to hospital closures and reduced access to care.
Historical Context and Medicaid’s Role
Medicaid has historically played a stabilizing role during economic downturns. During the 2009 recession, federal increases in Medicaid funding were linked to substantial job creation across various sectors. Research indicates that expanded public health insurance coverage has also helped reduce uncompensated care costs, particularly following the ACA’s implementation. Those costs dropped by roughly one-third due to Medicaid expansion.
The new proposal targets many of those ACA-era expansions. Without public coverage, individuals often delay or forego care, potentially leading to higher emergency room use and increased burdens on local health systems. This dynamic could contribute to rising insurance premiums and increased pressure on state and local budgets to fund uncompensated care.
Geographic Disparities
Data from the U.S. Census Bureau and Bureau of Labor Statistics show a correlation between high Medicaid enrollment rates and elevated unemployment in certain counties. Approximately half of the proposed Medicaid cuts would impact counties with above-average unemployment rates, making them more susceptible to negative economic fallout.
If enacted, the House budget proposal would significantly scale back public health insurance programs. Beyond the direct effect of increased uninsurance, the proposed cuts could impact employment, strain local health care systems, and increase costs for insured populations through indirect effects such as uncompensated care and emergency treatment demands. The final outcome depends on future legislative decisions and negotiations.
Stay informed and ahead of the curve — explore more industry insights and program opportunities at ProgramBusiness.com.